Smith College Admission Academics Student Life About Smith news Offices
Strategic Planning

JOIN THE PLANNING PROCESS

President Carol T. Christ is holding small-group conversations with students, faculty and staff about positioning Smith most successfully for the future. Here's a summary of one of the discussions.

March 14, 2006
Participants: Student Members of the Residence Life Staff

President Christ opened the discussion by enumerating some of the outcomes of the previous strategic planning process, which took place almost a decade ago. These include the Brown Fine Arts Center, the Campus Center, the Olin Fitness Center, the Praxis internship program, Women & Financial Independence and more. It is time, she said, to consider what the next 10 years should hold for Smith. She asked the group to think about what all students should acquire in their time at the college and, in a broader sense, what distinguishes Smith.

A prominent theme in the discussion was diversity. A student noted that the number of faculty of color has dropped. “They serve as mentors to students of color,” she said. “Their absence is felt, especially in the sciences.”

Another observed that students often feel pressure to love their houses and to remain in them, even if they feel isolated or seek greater diversity. “I lived in a diverse community and moved into a house without a lot of diversity to be a house community adviser but I am discouraged because I have no one to relate to,” she observed. Another said there are a handful of women of color in her house “and we are spread far apart and we feel alone.” She advocated for houses to have floors for women of color. Another suggested a “cultural house” for women of color. A third student disagreed, saying “we need to live with people different from ourselves, because being in uncomfortable situations makes a person learn. How are we supposed to live together outside of Smith if we can’t do it at Smith?”

A student who identified herself as handicapped expressed dissatisfaction with access to buildings. As a member of the residence life staff, she can only be assigned to certain houses with accessible rooms for her, she said, despite having broad qualifications.

Another major topic was dining and house community. Some students, particularly those in larger houses, described a “lack of connectedness” among house residents who no longer eat all meals together. Another student was concerned by a lack of respect for her house and for residents’ privacy, as expressed by non-residents who come to her house to eat. Discussion ensued about fostering house community without linking the process to “policy enforcement.”

Regarding specific food offerings, it was suggested that students be offered a 50 percent discount on items in the Campus Center Café. Another suggestion was to offer a soul food menu or food from the African diaspora, in addition to the other ethnic offerings currently available.

Concern was expressed about a perceived increase in average class size. A student suggested that large, popular classes should be offered more frequently. President Christ noted that that might not be a workable solution, since a faculty member might not want to teach the same course over and over. A student suggested that enforcement of prerequisites would be a useful way to keep classes small.

Discussion turned to topics specific to residence life staff and their role in supporting students. A student advocated expanding the counseling services staff; another suggestion was enhanced training for residence life student staff on issues of rape crisis and suicide. Several students expressed support for a “quiet house.” A general suggestion was made for “more support networks at Smith, a more holistic approach.”

Essential Information

Questions to Consider

Organization &
Structure

Process & Timeline

Assumptions About
the Planning Process

Planning Updates

NEASC
Reaccreditation

Join the Planning
Process

DirectoryCalendarCampus MapVirtual TourContact UsSite A-Z