|
 |
 |
 |
1 |
Members of
the Smith Community Genuinely like Smith |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In describing what
they appreciate most about the college, faculty members tended to focus on
intellectual engagement and high student ability, staff members focused on
excellent benefits, and students focused on the quality of the academic program
and on opportunities to grow. Our findings were supported by quantitative data
from surveys in which the college participates. Thus, for example, the Higher
Education Research Institute’s (HERI) Bi-Annual Faculty Survey (2004-05)
found that 86.3 percent of Smith faculty members were satisfied or very satisfied
with their jobs. Similarly, 91.2 percent of Smith undergraduates are satisfied
with their overall college experience, according to the Smith College Five-Year
Student Survey (2005).
My mind is constantly challenged and engaged.
I like the students a lot. I like the people that I work with every day and
that is faculty, staff and students (faculty member).
I would say that there is much good about being here. I love
my job. I have the perfect job. I see incredible young women. Incredible...they
are fabulous. (staff member).
For me it has been a good place to challenge myself. I am a
homebody, but I really like to throw myself into a new situation and it scares
me out of my mind, but in the end it is always a good thing filled with personal
growth. Smith has been absolutely an experience of personal growth for me (student).
Smith College Has Made Improvements Around Issues
of Diversity
The campus has become much more diverse and can continue to improve. The HERI
survey indicates that faculty members believe that the college treats recruitment
of minority students, faculty, and administrators as a priority. Specifically,
78.8 percent of faculty see recruiting more minority students as a high or
highest priority of the college; only 2.2 percent felt that increasing minority
representation among the faculty and administration was a low priority for
the college. Further, 91.4 percent felt that it was highly or somewhat descriptive
that Smith has respect for diverse values and beliefs.
There are people who work at the college who have actively pursued
an interest in the college becoming more diverse; so I think there is a dedicated
group of faculty and a dedicated group of staff and over time there have been
dedicated students and alums who think that one of the most important goals
of the college is to be diverse (faculty member).
I think it's better than many institutions. Smith recognizes
that there's a problem and that says a lot. I think there are other places
that say we don't have a problem and that shuts off the dialogue. The fact
that we’re sitting here speaks volumes to me (staff member).
I think the institution does bend over backwards because of
the history of the institution, because it did not start out an institution
for everyone and so I think there is a sensitivity to our own history that
current administration and current board of trustees want to distance themselves
from being an elite, white, wealthy girls school. And I think they have (student). |
 |
 |
 |
 |
2 |
Balancing Tradition
and Change |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Participants in the
Common Ground study appreciate the strong sense of tradition at Smith. That
tradition enhances the networks between students and alumnae and makes the
Smith experience unique. However, tradition does not come without costs in
a changing environment, and the college must reconcile the potential tensions
between maintaining traditions and innovating to meet the needs of a changing
world. Faculty, staff, and students identified the challenges that the college
faces as it tries to celebrate tradition and also move into the future. The
college needs to be clear about its values and its priorities as it engages
in the strategic planning process.
I think that the college is at this critical moment where it’s
going to have to decide, are we going to truly incorporate this level of diversity
into the way in which everything occurs or is it too much and too challenging
and too overwhelming, because it’s going to mean great change (faculty
member).
I came with a lot of assumptions and prejudices about Smith
College being an elite institution and I felt intimidated by that. Some of
those assumptions have born out and some have not, but I would say in general
I get the sense that Smith is trying to be two things at once [elite and accessible
to people from different backgrounds] (staff member). |
 |
 |
 |
 |
3 |
Diversity Lacks
Consistent and Clear Meaning |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
For many who participated
in the Common Ground project, the term “diversity” lacks consistent
meaning across campus. Every interview started with the question: How is diversity
understood at Smith? According to those who participated, the word is poorly
defined by the college to the extent that there is no common understanding
of the word among members of the community. Although participants believe that
diversity as a concept is critical to foster and embrace at Smith, they also
felt that the word “diversity” has been overused and has become
a “buzzword.” Questions emerged as to whether diversity is just
about numbers of people of color. Moreover, many articulated frustration with
the perspective that “each person is diverse.” While individuals
do have unique contributions to make to the community, such a perspective dilutes
the realities (both historical and current) of racism, sexism, homophobia,
able-ism, classism, xenophobia, and other experiences of oppression and discrimination.
My initial reaction was that diversity is understood superficially.
We use the word a lot. This is the first time I have been in a conversation
where the word’s meaning is in question (faculty member).
I think it’s understood in different ways by different
groups of people. I think part of some of the conflict that arises is that
people have a different understanding about what it means. So that expectations
about what a commitment to diversity means may sometimes put people at odds
with each other (staff member).
I think diversity is understood on a relatively superficial
level. I think it is about numbers and a lot of times it does not really address
things like class, and even within the numbers we are expected to have a “diverse” group
of people who come together and then after that we are not given the tools
to adapt to one another or to interact with one another (student). |
 |
 |
 |
 |
4 |
Words Cannot
Substitute for Action |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Participants in the
Common Ground study do not want attention to diversity to be symbolic only.
Instead, individuals urged the college to “walk the walk.” While
recognizing the college’s commitment to diversity (in the presence and
programs of the Office of Institutional Diversity, Otelia Cromwell Day, lectures,
and diversity in the curriculum), participants urged the college to move beyond
discussions of diversity to actions on individual and institutional levels.
The participants called for the college to make a commitment to increasing
numbers of underrepresented people among faculty, staff, and students, while
noting that numbers alone are not enough. The campus also must focus on retention
and on celebrating the diversity it has.
I do feel that we are better at talking the vision then walking
the vision. If you ask people of color, they would say that, well, they talk
the talk in confidence, but they don’t walk the walk (faculty member).
They have probably had some efforts toward recruiting, but it
is not just about recruiting. Once you get someone here you have to keep them.
In the same way in a marriage, whatever you did to attract that person, you
need to keep some of that going...You have to be able to make that person
want to stay in the job once they are here (staff member).
Also I would think to make this campus better, it is not enough
to only use [diversity] for propaganda to bring in different types of people.
Do it over the course of the year, several times a year, several times per
month, because the problem is that people really don’t know what diversity
is, they throw it around for one reason or another (student). |
 |
 |
 |
 |
5 |
Cultural Taxation |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The focus group participants
conveyed concerns about the cultural taxation of individuals from underrepresented
groups on campus. Faculty, staff, and students from underrepresented groups
indicated that they felt that mentorship (informal and formal) and other aspects
of diversity work were overwhelmingly their responsibility. Moreover, several
individuals who were not from underrepresented groups also recognized the increased
workloads often borne by members of underrepresented groups, because they are
often singled out to serve on committees, mentor, and otherwise do “diversity” work.
At the same time, many individuals observed that they have a compelling desire
to give back to their communities and thus enjoy engaging in activities related
to their cultures, despite the lack of extrinsic reward for these activities.
Typically, people who do that work in those communities are
over-taxed. The system is already taking everything I have. I am at the point
where I have to look the other way because I can’t expend myself (faculty
member).
But once again it is individual people’s efforts that
create these safe spaces. I think students from underrepresented groups know
who the people on campus are who are the safe people (staff member).
When you are representing a country, people just take your word
as gospel or fact, and I want to say: don’t take my word for it because
I am just a person explaining my own political view. I don’t want to
be speaking for my country. Sometimes I get really irritated by that (student). |
 |
 |
 |
 |
6 |
Students Want
to Give Priority to their Responsibilities as Students |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Students see their
role as students as their top priority. They spoke of the academic rigor of
the institution, and the high expectations for students held by faculty. They
chose Smith, first and foremost, because of its academic reputation, and they
work hard to live up to that choice. They also feel that they are supported
and mentored as students and are challenged to be successful. However, there
are obstacles, some of which are related to diversity, that compete with their
academic priorities.
I would say the main questions that arise from racial diversity
are really ones that students are in the best position to speak to (faculty
member).
Unfortunately, students often end up organizing any sort of
discussion related to diversity themselves and faculty have not been as engaged
in those events. For example, no faculty came to the student-led discussion
on trans issues (student).
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
7 |
Channels of
Communication |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Participants repeatedly
recommended that there be more open and inclusive channels of communication
between different constituencies on campus, particularly between the administration
and students, faculty, and staff, in times of conflict.
Communication from the institution is mostly through the grapevine
through staff and students. There was never any clear communication from the
institution (about conflicts). There were educational opportunities, but never
any clear information about incidents so we knew how to react or what to expect
in the student center (staff member). |
 |
 |
 |
 |
8 |
Civil Discourse
and Conflict |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Those participating
in the focus groups, discussion groups, and individual interviews shared that
conflict is part of what it means to exist in a diverse community. The community
needs to understand that conflict is not only acceptable, but is fundamental
to the educational process. Moreover, civil discourse is the only means of
working productively through conflict and disagreement. Participants agreed
that civil discourse is necessary and must be learned. Conversations around
diversity are difficult and complex. The community needs to learn the necessary
skills to engage in difficult dialogues related to diversity.
A lot of students come here to find a safe zone. An education
shouldn’t be safe. To teach courses to mirror understanding, it’s
not about understanding yourself. It’s about understanding the world
(faculty member).
We hear “I’m not comfortable speaking up” and
that is based on [students] not feeling comfortable with conflict. It is societal
that difference involves some level of conflict. We work to minimize conflict
rather than try to work toward a new point of understanding. The expectation
for comfort is high (staff member).
I want to say that it is uncomfortable to talk about issues
as diversity so much but at the same time I feel that it is necessary because
it is important to have a diverse campus and to see other people’s views
and an array of views. Even though it can be uncomfortable at times and that
can get to me, I can still appreciate it because it is important (student). |
 |
|
|
Background
Vision, Principles
& Goals
Action
Campus Engagement
Timeline
Focus Group
Themes
Focus Group
Voices
Working
Recommendations
Appendix
A:
Committee
Membership
Appendix
B: Protocol
Questions
Appendix
C: Focus
Group Demographics |